WebThe appellant, UKI (Kingsway) Limited (“the appellant”), owns the freehold of the building at 1 Kingsway (“the building”). In January 2009, it began a redevelopment of the building … WebOn 5 March 2012, the council delivered a completion notice by hand to the building, specifying 1 June 2012 as the completion date addressed to “Owner, 1 Kingsway, London …
Supreme Court to rule next week in case on rates and service of ...
Web1 Jan 2024 · At UTLC – UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council SC 17-Dec-2024 Short issue as to the requirements for valid ‘service’ of a completion notice so as to bring a newly completed building within liability for non-domestic rates. The notice had been served by email where no statutory authority existed for this. WebSupreme Court Published December 24, 2024 UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council Before Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore, Lord Carnwath, Lord Lloyd … free gaming pc parts
Failure to deliver completion notice correctly proves very costly
Webdocuments. UKI did not occupy any part of the building. On 5 March 2012 a completion notice (referring to 1 June 2012, as above) was delivered by hand to the building by the … Web1 Jan 2024 · Appeal from – UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council CA 15-Jun-2024. The parties disputed the effective service of a completion notice so as to bring the new … Web9 Mar 2015 · The completion notice was addressed to the Owner, 1 Kingsway, London WC2B 6AN . 7. Neither Eco FM nor its receptionist had any authority to accept the service of legal documents on behalf of the first respondent. 8. The receptionist scanned the completion notice and transmitted it electronically to the first respondent. blue 49ers hat