Sarah finch v surrey county council
Webb21 dec. 2024 · 3 cases. R (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council. United Kingdom. Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 17 February 2024. ...COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION (PLANNING COURT) MR JUSTICE … WebbCase Name: Finch, R (On the Application of) v Surrey County Council [2024] EWHC 3559 (QB) (21 December 2024) Full case: Click Here Commentary: This was an unsuccessful challenge to the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for the retention and expansion of two existing wells and the drilling of four new wells for the
Sarah finch v surrey county council
Did you know?
WebbVi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. WebbChief of Staff to Chief Executive & Interim Strategic Director of People & Change. Apr 2024 - Sep 20246 months. Reigate, England, United Kingdom.
Webb22 dec. 2024 · A Redhill woman opposed to oil drilling at Horse Hill has lost a legal challenge at the High Court. Sarah Finch argued that when Surrey County Council granted permission for 20 years of oil ... WebbR (Finch) v Surrey County Council allow a planning authority (or ES) to disregard a relevant environment effect of a particular development proposal, but do allow an authority to …
WebbSupreme Court to review EIA and downstream effects The Supreme Court granted permission to appeal on 9 August 2024 in R (Finch) v Surrey County Council & Others, in which the Court of Appeal gave judgment in February [2024] PTSR 958. Webb18 mars 2024 · I am taking Surrey County Council to court. I'm seeking a judicial review of their decision to allow a massive expansion of oil drilling at… Sarah Finch on LinkedIn: Major news alert!
WebbThe claimant, Sarah Finch, argued that SCC’s failure to consider these emissions in determining whether to approve the project was a breach of the UK’s obligations under …
Webb17 feb. 2024 · 2. With permission granted by Lewison L.J., the appellant, Sarah Finch, appeals against the order of Holgate J. dated 23 December 2024, dismissing her claim for judicial review of the planning permission granted by the first respondent, Surrey County Council, for the retention and extension of the Horse Hill Well Site, near Horley. swiss united methodist church new glarus wiWebb6 feb. 2024 · The case arose over coverage of a remote High Court hearing on 17 November 2024 concerning judicial review proceedings against Surrey County Council over its decision to grant planning permission for fracking operations at … swiss universities scholarshipsWebb2 mars 2024 · R (Finch) v Surrey County Council CA (Civ Div) [2024] EWCA Civ 187 “The task of the court in a claim such as this is only to decide the issues of law. Those issues … swiss universities that offer translationWebb3 feb. 2024 · The Queen on the application of Sarah Finch Claimant and Surrey County Council Defendant Trevor Burke QC and Jonathan Scherbel-Ball for the BBC Hearing … swiss university ras al khaimahWebb17 feb. 2024 · Sarah Finch appealed. She argued that Holgate J’s interpretation of the EIA Regulations was incorrect, and the EIA had to include an assessment of the GHG … swiss universities english speakingWebb23 feb. 2024 · Article summary. Planning analysis: The decision of Surrey County Council to grant planning permission for the retention and extension of the existing Horse Hill Well Site for the commercial extraction of crude oil was held to be lawful by the Court of Appeal following judicial review proceedings brought by the appellant, Sarah Finch and the … swiss university city crossword clueWebbOverview and context. R (Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group & Others) v. Surrey County Council (& Others) Jurisdiction: High Court of England and Wales. Principle law … swiss unlimited lyssach